Skip to main content
Available in English

Structural change and productivity growth 20 years later: old problems, new opportunities. Summary

Publication cover

Structural change and productivity growth 20 years later: old problems, new opportunities. Summary

Autor institucional: NU. CEPAL Physical Description: 57 páginas. Editorial: ECLAC Date: June 2008 ECLAC symbol: LC/G.2368(SES.32/4)


IntroductionNearly 20 years ago, ECLAC put forward a proposal for structural change and productivity growth with social equity. At the time, the countries of the region were emerging from the severe crisis of the 1980s, with all its associated difficulties in terms of internal stabilization and external adjustment, and heading into a decade of structural reform which heeded the call of the Washington Consensus. In the midst of perplexity and pessimism regarding the region's prospects, ECLAC espoused a view of the situation that ran counter to the orthodox line of thought that marked economic policy tenets of the time.The idée-force underlying this view situated the region within the universe of developing countries and highlighted the deteriorating situation by using the metaphor of an empty box" to symbolize the difficulties that the region was having in reconciling growth with social equity. This proposal for structural change and productivity growth was thus aimed at promoting economic expansion and social equity, not sequentially, but simultaneously. A reduction in inequity contributes to the cohesiveness of the various actors involved, either directly or indirectly, in the production process. Consequently, persistently high degrees of inequity will, over the medium term, erode an economy's competitiveness.In addressing the issue of economic growth, ECLAC started out by taking stock of the major changes that were taking place at that time in the world and the way in which they were redefi ning a recurring theme in its thinking: the generation and diffusion of technical progress. This proposal assigned a key role to manufacturing because that was the sector  which offered the greatest potential in terms of technical progress and its diffusion. It also recognized the existence of signifi cant complementarities with the agricultural and services sectors, however, and called for measures to strengthen these tie-ins as a crucial step towards generating technological spillovers and both backward and forward linkages.It contended that, in order to achieve technical progress and boost productivity, the region's economies had to become more open, but it also drew a distinction between genuine and spurious competitiveness and emphasized the systemic nature of this phenomenon. At the same time, it emphasized that the transition to greater economic openness should be gradual, should place priority on exports, and should be underpinned by a stable competitive real exchange rate.Throughout the 1990s and the early years of the following decade, ECLAC continued to develop various aspects of this integrated approach to structural change, at times focusing more on economic issues, at times highlighting social considerations, but at all times setting its proposals within the institutional context of the region. At no time did these shifts in emphasis detract from its integrated conceptualization of the development process. In fact, ECLAC has always approached economic, social and institutional issues as an integral set of interacting, mutually conditioning factors.How the relevant measures are organized and how much time is devoted to each dimension are also important factors, however. In recent works, ECLAC has stressed the social dimension, which, all the same, has invariably entailed economic and institutional considerations. This has certainly been the case in some of the Commission's latest documents, such as Shaping the Future of Social Protection and Social Cohesion: Inclusion  and a sense of belonging. In that publication, ECLAC is focusing on the issue of equality of opportunity as it relates to education, exclusionary labour-market dynamics, redistribution of assets via social expenditure, promotion of the full exercise of citizenship within a strengthened democratic framework and the consolidation of more inclusive societies.The pace of the global changes that were discussed in the Commission's 1990 proposal has accelerated, and new actors have emerged which have significantly altered previous balances in the world economy in terms of both supply and demand. These events have triggered major structural changes. The time has therefore come to re-examine the Commission's views on structural change and productivity growth in the light of new circumstances in order to determine if the new opportunities associated with emerging technological and economic paradigms and the growing hyper-segmentation of markets can help to overcome the region's old problems of structural heterogeneity and to identify new forms of competitiveness that are not being fully exploited.The countries of Latin America and the Caribbean fi nd themselves in varying positions in terms of competitiveness and learning. It is on the basis of these positions, in conjunction with their stock of resources and capabilities, that they take part in the global economy. Diversifying and developing these positions is the crux of any strategy for structural change and productivity growth. Although such strategies must clearly have national characteristics, closer coordination and greater economic integration among the countries of the region would be of enormous help in achieving greater economies of scale, complementarities and cumulative learning.Moving forward with this task within the framework of each national reality will entail mobilizing a broad range of diffuse social energies, and public policy plays a key role in this respect. It is important, fi rst of all, to organize each country's search for a medium- and long-term vision within the global context and to catalyse efforts to detect present and future opportunities. Second, it is also crucial to build lasting alliances with the private sector based on reciprocal benefi ts and commitments that will make it possible to formulate and implement strategies for gradually making that vision a reality and taking advantage of the opportunities that present themselves.All of this requires the formation of a wide-ranging consensus capable of underpinning agreements in various spheres of national affairs. Viewed from this standpoint, the integrated approach to development that is so much a part of the Commission's thinking takes on renewed significance. Although proposals in given areas may be analytically separable, the type of broad national consensus that can make such proposals viable is necessarily multidimensional. In other words, in the fullest sense of the proposal for bringing about structural change and productivity growth with greater equity, social consensus-building must encompass an inseparable whole involving a unifi ed array of agreements concerning growth, social equity and institutional development.The objective of Structural Change and Productivity Growth - 20 Years Later. Old problems, new opportunities is therefore to determine exactly what opportunities and challenges the region is facing in this new international economic environment. It is an environment marked by changes in actors and in the nature and intensity of trade fl ows, shifting patterns of structural change and an ever more rapid pace of technical progress at a time when new technological paradigms that have a profound impact on many sectors' competitive dynamics are emerging and becoming consolidated. Chapter I examines the region's performance in the world economy, along with the opportunities that are opening up for Latin America and the Caribbean in the new global economic environment. An analysis of long-term trends relating to convergence and disparities in per capita income is followed by an exploration of economic growth processes and structural change in the production sector. The discussion then turns to the main changes that have occurred in the world economy from the standpoint of both the organization of production and business models and the simultaneous shift towards the massifi cation and stratifi cation of demand at the international level. The final part of this chapter looks at the strengths of the region's economic performance in recent years and at basic lines of action for bringing about structural changes and productivity growth that will enable the countries to deepen and diversify the ways in which they position themselves within the international economy.Chapter II reviews the region's economic and export performance in the past quarter century. It begins by examining macroeconomic trends in the region, with emphasis on the internal and external elements that played a role in the slow, volatile economic growth that characterized the region from 1980 until its performance began to improve in 2003. It then goes on to analyse productivity gains as a growth factor and their close relationship to the dynamics of the production structure. Emphasis is placed on a number of productivity determinants, such as the application of knowledge to economic activities, the diversification of the production structure and the effi ciency of service delivery with respect to physical infrastructure. The chapter concludes with an analysis of the way in which exports have helped to promote structural change and drive growth since 1980 through their aggregate contribution, product and market diversification, incorporation of knowledge and the technological externalities generated by trade and foreign direct investment.Technological dynamics in the region and opportunities for improving the performance of companies and the products they export are the main focus of chapter III. A comparison of national R&D efforts and their relative effectiveness is followed by an examination of private sector innovation in manufacturing in various countries of the region and an analysis of its impact on productivity, wages and exports. Obstacles to the further development of process and product innovations are also identified. The unit values of exports are then used to assess the region's capacity for positioning itself in the international economy more successfully by adding quality to its exports. To this end, the quality of its exports is evaluated by comparing the prices of goods exported by the region with those of similar goods from developed and developing regions. The region's share of world trade over the last decade, disaggregated by level of quality, is also analysed. Finally, in view of the importance of agricultural goods for Latin America and the Caribbean, a more extensive discussion is offered of the region's position in world (and especially developed-country) markets for these products. In the light of the evidence presented this analysis, a number of ways of improving that position in terms of export quality are explored.Chapter IV looks at the emerging opportunities for the countries of the region that are associated with the new techno-economic paradigms. These employ the shared evolutionary path of technological changes and economic development as a basis for understanding how the region reacts to and engages in the diffusion of these technologies in the economic and social spheres. The implications of information and communications technologies (ICTs) are described, together with the elements that must be in place in order for society as a whole, the economic system, infrastructure and industry to adapt to the new processes and products that these technologies engender. The focus then turns to an analysis of the incipient diffusion of biotechnology and how this is shaping corporate strategies and forms of industrial organization. Consideration is also given to the efforts required to create a system capable of increasing and directing R&D and human resources in ways that will stimulate the adaptation and absorption of these new technologies.Given the heterogeneity of the Latin American and Caribbean countries' production structures, any analysis of opportunities and  challenges requires a sector-by-sector evaluation. This assessment is undertaken in chapter V, which describes the learning processes and technological capacities found in four different sectors which are characteristic, on differing scales of relative importance, of the production structures and international economic integration of the countries of the region. These sectors are the agroindustrial complex, mining, manufacturing (both those industries created during the import-substitution industrialization (ISI) model and export-oriented manufacturing industries) and services. An analysis is then undertaken of the windows of opportunity that are being opened up in each of these areas by new cross-cutting technological paradigms. To take advantage of these opportunities, the countries will have to make considerable efforts to develop technology that can shift the profi le of their production structures towards activities better suited to generating and propagating innovations. In the fi nal section, the opportunities for achieving upgrading in the global value chains of various products are examined.Drawing on the foregoing analysis of opportunities and challenges for bringing about a more dynamic process of structural change and productivity growth, chapter VI explores the strategic modalities that have been adopted by a number of countries outside the region that are regarded as being "success stories". This analysis focuses on determining how these countries have organized public-sector institutional processes relating to the development and implementation of medium- and longterm national strategies within the framework of a public-private alliance. An examination of the various organizational procedures employed by the public sector and its support programmes for promoting structural change, productivity growth and international economic integration serves as the basis for the formulation of 12 "fi rst principles" in this regard. The same parameters are then used to determine where the Latin American and Caribbean countries stand in terms of the creation of a strategic national vision, public-private alliances and consensus. This appraisal suggests that these principles are indeed relevant for a region which needs to deepen and diversify its production apparatus within the framework of today's globalization process.Chapter VII presents a number of concluding remarks and observations dealing with some of the central points made in the study, together with a discussion of opportunities for the region to move forward with a process of structural change and productivity growth that can accelerate the rate of economic expansion and help it to achieve greater social equity."